Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Tread lightly on the things of earth

Mike’s weblog about computing, politics, and faith (a progressive view)

Tags: , , , , Discernment 101

Magnificent quote of the day from The Village Gate:

Ultimately, this election persists in becoming an intelligence test for the American people. It’s not only on policy matters, either. Do we still have the moral discernment to detect the difference between a total fake and a flawed but honorable and competent human being?

[iStockPhoto: Jack Schiffer: Figs growing on a fig tree]I think it’s also a test of Have We Learned Anything? Has our attending church all these years (for those of us who have) been for naught if we still can’t discern wheat from chaff? Wheat-sowers from weed-sowers? Fertile ground from hardpan? Figs from no figs? (Or, to go extrabiblical here, cattle from hat?)

Thanks, Allen. This is what I was trying to say, though not achieving this succinctness, in last month’s The elect on Judgment Day.

2004-09-02 update: In addition to Allen’s election-as-intelligence-test and my election-as-life-learning-test, William Saletan at Slate powerfully makes the case (in the wake of Zell Miller et al. at the RNC) that the election has become “a referendum on your right to hold the president accountable,” which, given that in a democracy the president works for us and we can fire him for poor performance, “a referendum on democracy.”

Comments

  1. Allen? As in Allen Brill, the founder of the original "The Right Christians" site that morphed into "The Village Gate"? If so, glad to see him back. While I'm an agnostic leaning towards atheism myself, I was saddened to see him "hounded" out of the blogosphere by more intolerant non-religious bloggers. If he's back I'll have to pay more attention to TVG.

    Len Cleavelin    Saturday August 21, 2004    #
  2. "Do we still have the moral discernment to detect the difference between a total fake and a flawed but honorable and competent human being?"

    Gee, as much as I don't like John Kerry, I wouldn't call him a total fake. Sort of a stopped clock, he ends up on the proper side of an issue occasionally. That seems a little harsh to me.

    Michael    Sunday September 12, 2004    #
  3. Michael, you're either serious (less likely) or forgot to use a smiley emoticon (more likely).

    The fakery lies elsewhere. And the term "total fake" does not begin to be harsh enough.

    Mike    Monday September 13, 2004    #