Methodist Social Affirmation: The kingdom that could be
Today I attended the small-town United Methodist church I grew up in and was struck on hearing the World Methodist Council Social Affirmation for the first time.
Today I attended the small-town, west Tennessee United Methodist church I grew up in, part of honoring my parents’ 50th wedding anniversary.
I’ve hardly set foot in a Methodist church for 20+ years, so I was surprised today on hearing the World Methodist Council Social Affirmation for the first time (“adopted by WMC [in] 1986”).
I was struck by the following thoughts:
This affirmation of faith is beautiful
In its beauty this affirmation convicts U.S. actions under the Bush Administration (convicts in the legal sense, “to find guilty of an offense or crime,” highlighting a severe disconnect between words and deeds)
See what I mean, especially in the center section:
We rejoice in every sign of God’s Kingdom;
in the upholding of human dignity and community;
in every expression of love, justice and reconciliation;
in each act of self-giving on behalf of others;
in the abundance of God’s gifts
entrusted to us that all may have enough;
in all responsible use of the earth’s resources. …We confess our sin, individual and collective, by silence or action:
- through the violation of human dignity based on race, class, age, sex, nation, or faith;
- through the exploitation of people because of greed and indifference
- through the misuse of power in personal, communal, national, and international life;
- through the search for security by those military and economic forces that threaten human existence;
- through the abuse of technology which endangers the earth and all life upon it. …
We commit ourselves individually and as a community
to the way of Christ:
to take up the cross;
to seek abundant life for all humanity;
to struggle for peace with justice and freedom;
to risk ourselves in faith, hope, and love,
praying that God’s kingdom may come.
Is this affirmation true to the gospel? I think it is.
Despite all our “Christian” talk at the U.S. national level, <understatement>we’re not exercising the plain meaning of this affirmation.</understatement>
A reasonable prayer, seems to me then, is that this affirmation’s meaning would further convict Administration personnel in the theological sense, “to make aware of one’s sinfulness or guilt.” What a glorious day that’d be, in heaven and on earth, if repentance emanated from the White House, setting an example for all of us, instead of emanating its opposite, self-righteous arrogance.
United Methodism is Mr. Bush’s denomination. If this affirmation is representative, his denomination gets it.
No wonder he [reportedly] never goes to church. These are hard words to face/affirm until one truly intends them.
How might things be different if he did?
How might things be different if we lived this way?
